Audience
New members, students, and civic readers
Book Reality / Draft / Not started
Learners practice distinguishing claim, evidence, assumption, and interpretation.
New members, students, and civic readers
Not started
Initial review within 7 civic working days after artifact submission
Foundation Review Circle
Lesson Workflow
Module 1 / 45 minutes
Identify the difference between a public claim and the evidence that supports it.
Teach-back prompt
Explain how a civic claim changes when evidence, assumption, and uncertainty are separated.
Evidence standard
Artifact must identify at least one claim, one source, one assumption, and one unresolved question.
Module 2 / 60 minutes
Explain why responsible civic design must name limits and costs.
Teach-back prompt
Describe why a proposal becomes more trustworthy when its limits are named plainly.
Evidence standard
Reality map must include benefits, constraints, risks, unknowns, and a proposed next question.
Artifact Review
Learner artifact names the claim, concept, or practice being demonstrated.
Artifact includes source language, local example, and an open question or limitation.
Facilitator note explains whether the artifact is ready, needs revision, or should enter the knowledge graph.
Reviewed learner artifacts can become glossary entries, operating sheets, evidence notes, service plans, or memory records.
Academy pathway records are illustrative. Artifact controls are shown as review commitments in this static demo.
Academy