Identity
VerifiedIdentity reviewed
Contribution Reviewer
Jacksonville, Florida
Jordan helps the Directory distinguish a declared contribution from one supported by reviewable evidence.
Record Facts
Each fact carries its own status. A verified identity does not automatically verify every role, contribution, affiliation, or statement on the profile.
Identity reviewed
Contribution reviewer in training
Partner and event evidence
Evidence Drawer
Draft checklist exists and is waiting for constitutional review before reuse.
A person or organization represented here may request correction, submit evidence, challenge a status, or ask for human review. Requests now route into the Directory intake queue before any public fact, affiliation, or trust status changes.
Current correction path
In review
Assigned reviewer will publish a status note before October review close
Name the claim
Identify the exact fact, status, affiliation, or contribution being challenged.
Attach evidence
Provide a source, witness note, record, or explanation that supports the correction.
Route to review
A review owner checks the request against Directory guardrails before changing the public record.
Intake is saved locally in this browser until server storage and reviewer accounts are added.
Reviewer Workflow
The demo now shows what reviewers need before a profile changes and which guardrails keep the decision narrow, evidenced, and correctable.
Affected record field
RequiredName the exact profile claim, evidence item, affiliation, or status being challenged.
Corrected statement
RequiredState the replacement language or explain why the current statement should be removed.
Supporting evidence
RequiredAttach a document, source note, meeting record, direct attestation, or explanation of first-hand knowledge.
Contact and consent
RequiredProvide a contact path for follow-up and confirm the request may be reviewed by the assigned human steward.
Urgency explanation
RecommendedExplain whether the claim creates immediate reputational, safety, or operational harm.
Purpose limitation
Is the claim being reviewed only for the limited Directory purpose stated on the record?
Guardrail: Trust is purpose-specific and must not become a general personal worth score.
Evidence boundary
Does the proposed status match the evidence currently visible to reviewers?
Guardrail: Claims should not outrun evidence, enthusiasm, relationship, or reputation.
Correction right
Has the affected person, organization, or chapter been given a clear path to correct or contextualize the record?
Guardrail: Directory records remain reviewable and open to correction.
Authority disclosure
Is the source authority marked as foundational, draft for ratification, or research and deliberation?
Guardrail: The platform must distinguish moral authority, draft governance language, and research claims.
Decision Log
Reviewer decisions become part of the profile record so future stewards can see what changed, who owned the review, and what authority was actually granted.
Outcome policy
Reviewer-in-training status cannot advance until supervision notes, review samples, and a conflict check are recorded.
Training role intake
July 3, 2026
Directory Review Circle
Identity verified; contribution reviewer role remains provisional pending supervised review evidence.
Queue assignment
July 9, 2026
Directory Review Circle
Assigned follow-up review before October review close.
Chapter Affiliation
Reviewer-in-training role is visible but still bounded by supervision requirements.
Active Review Queue
Evidence review / Reviewer assigned
Directory inclusion is not endorsement. Trust status is purpose-specific, evidence-linked, reviewable, and open to correction.
Directory