Identity
VerifiedIdentity and contributor agreement reviewed
Academy Facilitator
Remote
Mara develops learning sessions that distinguish foundational commitments from draft interpretation and contested policy application.
Record Facts
Each fact carries its own status. A verified identity does not automatically verify every role, contribution, affiliation, or statement on the profile.
Identity and contributor agreement reviewed
Academy facilitator
Remote and campus cohorts
Evidence Drawer
Learner reflections and facilitator notes support the described Academy contribution.
Assessment design is reviewed, while future cohort outcomes remain under study.
A person or organization represented here may request correction, submit evidence, challenge a status, or ask for human review. Requests now route into the Directory intake queue before any public fact, affiliation, or trust status changes.
Current correction path
Available
Initial human review within 7 civic working days
Name the claim
Identify the exact fact, status, affiliation, or contribution being challenged.
Attach evidence
Provide a source, witness note, record, or explanation that supports the correction.
Route to review
A review owner checks the request against Directory guardrails before changing the public record.
Intake is saved locally in this browser until server storage and reviewer accounts are added.
Reviewer Workflow
The demo now shows what reviewers need before a profile changes and which guardrails keep the decision narrow, evidenced, and correctable.
Affected record field
RequiredName the exact profile claim, evidence item, affiliation, or status being challenged.
Corrected statement
RequiredState the replacement language or explain why the current statement should be removed.
Supporting evidence
RequiredAttach a document, source note, meeting record, direct attestation, or explanation of first-hand knowledge.
Contact and consent
RequiredProvide a contact path for follow-up and confirm the request may be reviewed by the assigned human steward.
Urgency explanation
RecommendedExplain whether the claim creates immediate reputational, safety, or operational harm.
Purpose limitation
Is the claim being reviewed only for the limited Directory purpose stated on the record?
Guardrail: Trust is purpose-specific and must not become a general personal worth score.
Evidence boundary
Does the proposed status match the evidence currently visible to reviewers?
Guardrail: Claims should not outrun evidence, enthusiasm, relationship, or reputation.
Correction right
Has the affected person, organization, or chapter been given a clear path to correct or contextualize the record?
Guardrail: Directory records remain reviewable and open to correction.
Authority disclosure
Is the source authority marked as foundational, draft for ratification, or research and deliberation?
Guardrail: The platform must distinguish moral authority, draft governance language, and research claims.
Decision Log
Reviewer decisions become part of the profile record so future stewards can see what changed, who owned the review, and what authority was actually granted.
Outcome policy
Academy facilitation claims require learner artifacts or facilitator review notes before a verified teaching status is expanded.
Facilitator evidence review
July 5, 2026
Academy Review Team
Foundation orientation contribution verified; campus affiliation remains self-reported.
Chapter Affiliation
Facilitation role is reviewed; campus affiliation awaits chapter confirmation.
Directory inclusion is not endorsement. Trust status is purpose-specific, evidence-linked, reviewable, and open to correction.
Directory